Vox Populi

Posts Tagged ‘Conservatism’

The Players: a Scribe to produce content: Mr. Patrick J. Wright

In broken tort reform, buying elections, ideology, MI Supreme Court, propoganda, Think tank on December 8, 2009 at 11:41 pm

We have already identified that a good, and inexpensive way to lobby the highest state court is to align, enlist or adopt an advocacy group (PAC, special interest…all really just IRS labels). We have also seen how one, lone writer can wrap up ideology in the form of editorials.

It is one such scribe which will be today’s focus: Mr. Patrick J. Wright.  He is:

is senior legal analyst at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, where he directs the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation. He joined the Center in June 2005 after serving for three years as a Michigan Supreme Court commissioner, a post in which he made recommendations to the court concerning which state appeals court cases it should hear.

We have heard about the Mackinac Center as an arm for “free market” legislation.  That is fine.  It is a free country.

I would note that when filling ones staff with experts, it is a good idea to find ones whose legal experience mirrors ones ideological profile.  That is, hire the ones who have said what you wish to say.  Assure pedigree.  Mr. Wright is the right person for this Right job.  In fact, if one is looking to influence the highest state court, find a person who worked for them, at a lower-level job (reading through the cases and making recommendations on which ones to take up) during the time that you wish to match ruling-wise (the 2003 court was very  conservative, pro-business and all about upholding “tort reform”).

Once on staff, free him up to write to his heart’s content.  You might even get him to land editorials for national news outlets.  His opinion, because it is just that, need not be grounded in fact.  In fact, facts may even begin to muck up a good argument, so be wary in employing them.

Once you have the right man for the job, produce the content, influence the vote, and let the right party win.


The Methods: viral e-mails: Health Care example

In buying elections, Get the Ca$h, ideology on December 2, 2009 at 7:02 pm
viral happens
Image by Will Lion via Flickr

One effective means of distributing ones agenda is to have random people do the distribution for you.  With the web 2.0’s social nature, a document, screed or set of talking points can easily “go viral” in that one person sends it to their friends and family, a sub-set of which sends it to theirs…on and on until an exponential distribution has been made, for free.

One such example landed in my inbox this morning.  An unnamed member of my family sent what was purported to be a letter from a doctor to his congressman outlining the deficiencies in the debated health care overhaul bill.  By ascribing the author as an authority on the matter (a physician, one assumes, would know the business of healthcare), the e-mail carries as much implied weight as an editorial (see yesterday’s note).  By presenting the note as a template, there is the implied, if not outright desire, for the recipient to copy/paste the letter to her congressman.

However, the problem/trick/tool (depending on your use of this method) is that the information provided in the viral e-mail may not be accurate.  In fact, viral e-mails are often ideological talking points that pass themselves off as “fact” or, in this case, learned opinion.

The e-mail reads, in part for it is rather long:

Senator Bayh,

As a practicing physician I have major concerns with the health care bill before Congress. I actually have read the bill and am shocked by the brazenness of the government’s proposed involvement in the patient-physician relationship. The very idea that the government will dictate and ration patient care is dangerous and certainly not helpful in designing a health care system that works for all. Every physician I work with agrees that we need to fix our health care system, but the proposed bills currently making their way through congress will be a disaster if passed.

I ask you respectfully and as a patriotic American to look at the following troubling lines that I have read in the bill. You cannot possibly believe that these proposals are in the best interests of the country and our fellow citizens.

Page 22 of the HC Bill:

Mandates that the Govt will audit books of all employers that self-insure!!

Page 29 lines 4-16 in the HC bill:


Notice that a good viral e-mail has a liberal use of capitalization–gets one excited.

Once the information/talking points is placed in its final form (extra points for extensive punctuation, exciting rhetoric and apocalyptic portents), it may not only be e-mailed around, it will also be posted on blogs and other web-sites by the true-believing choir.

In essence, the viral message (it can be e-mail, video, etc.) uses crowd-sourcing technologies to disseminate an ideological group’s propaganda.

Was the e-mail sent by a real doctor?  There is a physician of the same name (a link provided by a helpful re-blogger), but even if the physician is real, and even if he believes his points (two large assumptions when dealing with viral media), that really only comes into play if what he says is true.

Here is a portion of a site that has taken the time to refute, point by laborious point, the entire e-mail.  I give only a snippet:

• Page 22: Mandates audits of all employers that self-insure! False: Section 113  of the bill requires the Health Choices commissioner to conduct a study to make sure health reform does not unintentionally create incentives for businesses to self-insure or create adverse selection in the risk pools of insured plans. There is no mandated audit.

• Page 29: Admission: your health care will be rationed! False: Section 122 outlines broad categories of benefits that must be included in an essential benefits package. It prohibits cost-sharing for preventive care and limits annual out-of-pocket spending to $5,000 for an individual and $10,000 for a family, indexed for inflation. It says nothing about rationing or limiting treatment.

So, quick-format follows:

  1. gather your talking points,
  2. attribute them to an “expert,” wise person or some other authority,
  3. send it to your friends and family,
  4. encourage them to pass it along, and soon, you will be viral.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The Methods: get your ideas out–editorials

In buying elections, Campaign Finance, Get the Ca$h, ideology, Think tank on December 2, 2009 at 3:49 am

Once you have identified your friends (think tanks, special interests groups, etc.), let them get your agenda out in front of the voting public.  Like the guy at the right, James M. Hohman, who works for the Mackinac Center for Policy (advocates of “free markets”–whatever that may be other than very conservative, Glenn Beck-esque ideologies).  His job/bio, as stated on the center’s web site, reads as such:

James M. Hohman is a fiscal policy analyst with the Mackinac Center’s fiscal policy initiative. He holds a degree in economics from Northwood University in Midland, Mich.

Part of his duties as a “fiscal policy analyst” is to write policy papers (like this one where he argues that Michigan’s economic crisis is not tied to the automaker’s decline–he fails to note to what it is tied–but the tax system is working just fine).   Once a paper is written, it is posted to the center’s web site (like this one: Site Selection, Jennifer Granholm [Mackinac Center]).

The article, though, lives on in other forms.  For instance, that very same article appears as an editorial in the small town newspaper The Big Rapids Pioneer in their News and Opinions page.  Couched as an editorial, this position paper now commands, at least for some readers, the respect of a newspaper’s editorial blessing.

If you, with your agenda, can pull this off often enough, your message, like a drum-beat, will be heard often, with tacitly coded authority granted just by being printed in the editorial page of the local newspaper.  For many voters, those who read and think about things, this may be enough to slide them to your position.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]